Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: INITIAL and NEXT extent sizing question
Fred,
It is my understanding that NEXT being set to the same value of INITIAL is good idea in terms of keep fragmentation of tablespaces to a minimum. This is also assuming that you keep the extent sizes of other tables in the tablespace to that same extent size. This then means that should a table be dropped for any reason, those extents can easily be reused by another table wanting to extend.
-----Original Message-----
From: root_at_fatcity.com [mailto:root_at_fatcity.com]On Behalf Of Fred Smith
Sent: 25 September 2000 17:36
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: INITIAL and NEXT extent sizing question
I have a table with rows currently populating. I wish to resize the table
for better performance. What is the best way I should figure out how to
size my INITIAL and NEXT extent sizes for this table. Is it just:
1) Analyze the table
2) SELECT BLOCKS * (block_size) from dba_tables for the table in question =
what the initial size should be set to.
3) What determines what I should set the NEXT extent size to then?
Thank you,
-Fred S.
Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com.
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: Fred Smith
INET: fred_fred_1_at_hotmail.com
Fat City Network Services -- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051 San Diego, California -- Public Internet access / Mailing Liststo: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing). Received on Tue Sep 26 2000 - 08:09:03 CDT
--------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
![]() |
![]() |