RE: Oracle Win NT Configuration Standards

Excellent response Chris!

Hopefully Sean will have an item in his paper indicating that, unlike Linux, it may not be a good idea to run Oracle/NT on a 486-66. :)

ep

On 20 Sep 2000, at 13:30, Bowes, Chris wrote:

Date sent:      	Wed, 20 Sep 2000 13:30:40 -0800
To:             	Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <ORACLE-L_at_fatcity.com>
Send reply to:  	ORACLE-L_at_fatcity.com
From:           	"Bowes, Chris" <Chris.Bowes_at_kosa.com>
Subject:        	RE: Oracle Win NT Configuration Standards

> Well, if by standard base, you mean SGA settings, then no. There is no
> "standard" base. What Sean has is the filenames, locations, data vs index
> vs other file locations and the like. Based upon that definition, then,
> yes, you can have a standard base configuration. His paper (which I read)
> is looking at the OFA layouts, what to name the files, what goes in which
> tablespace, what to name the archive logs, how to mirror, what raid levels
> are preferred, etc. I believe that you can have standards in those areas
> that would cover both the OLTP with 100 users and the DSS with only 5.
>
>
> --Chris
> Chris.Bowes_at_Kosa.com
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2000 4:11 PM
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
>
>
>
> Is there a standard database? I mean, don't you think that it is impossible
> to do? Maybe I need an OLTP database with 100 user connection and someone
> else wants a DSS database with 5 connections, etc.
>
> Regards,
> Satar
>
> -----Original Message-----
> Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2000 3:46 PM
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
>
> Hi Folks,
>
> I've put together a document which specifies configuration standard
> guidelines for Oracle on Win NT platform. If anyone would like to review it
>
> I will send it to them backchannel in PDF format for feedback on same.
Received on Wed Sep 20 2000 - 17:33:18 CDT