Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: Oracle Fail Safe and MS Cluster Server solutions
List,=20
After searching /re-searching we have decided on "fail safe" (NT =
cluster)=20
for high availability for our db. It seems that OFS offers this =
solutions
using easy to implement tools and does not cost much in terms of =
hardware.
Two nodes will take care of the instance failure and datafiles on =
external
RAID
storage will take care of any media failure.=20
One mismatch i found in the metalink docs. is when they mention about =
the
"load sharing"
between nodes !! how can there be load sharing when the "MS cluster =
server"
allows
ONLY "share nothing" model ???
Rahul
> ----------
> From: Boivin, Patrice J[SMTP:BoivinP_at_mar.dfo-mpo.gc.ca]
> Reply To: ORACLE-L_at_fatcity.com
> Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2000 3:10 AM
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> Subject: Oracle Fail Safe and MS Cluster Server solutions
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
> Systems Admin & Operations | Admin. et Exploit. des syst=E8mes
> Technology Services | Services technologiques
> Informatics Branch | Direction de l'informatique=20
> Maritimes Region, DFO | R=E9gion des Maritimes, MPO
>=20
>=20> To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
> Fat City Network Services -- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051
> San Diego, California -- Public Internet access / Mailing =
Lists
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
![]() |
![]() |