Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: Compare Oracle to SQL Server
Dan,
For the interfacing part, check out DirectConnect from Sybase (even if you're not using a Sybase RDBMS) http://www.sybase.com/detail?id=204835
HTH,
Koen.
dmcdona3%csc.com_at_Internet
06/09/2000 05:22
To: ORACLE-L%fatcity.com_at_Internet cc: (bcc: Koen Lefever/GKBCCB) Subject: Compare Oracle to SQL Server
We are evaluating packages and a question of a UNIX/Oracle platform Vs. an NT/SQL Server platform is raised. Specifically we are concerned with SQL Server and if it can scale and does it have breaking points. Are interfaces from Oracle to SQL Server easy or problematic. Input is needed and references to resources are welcome.
TIA,
Dan McDonald
-- Author: INET: dmcdona3_at_csc.com Fat City Network Services -- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051 San Diego, California -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists -------------------------------------------------------------------- To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing). ------------------------------ From: "Walter K" <alden14004_at_yahoo.com> Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2000 08:14:54 -0500 Subject: Analyze Indexes vs. Table This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_001C_01C017DA.89B69E90 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable What are the pros/cons of analyzing only the indexes of a table versus = analyzing the table (which will also analyze the indexes)? I'm asking this because I am using a data extraction tool that does just = this--it only analyzes the indexes of a table rather than the table = itself. This approach seems reasonable in theory but it appears that it = does not produce comparable execution paths. I have found that unless I = analyze the table, the execution path will not take advantage of a = bitmap index for a delete operation against the table. What are your opinions and experiences?Received on Wed Sep 06 2000 - 07:44:36 CDT
![]() |
![]() |