Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: **Buffer retention in cache to address disk reads problem

RE: **Buffer retention in cache to address disk reads problem

From: Rahul <rahul_at_ratelindo.co.id>
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2000 11:41:34 +0700
Message-Id: <10610.116266@fatcity.com>


Surya, high number of disk reads could also be a result of a very bad sql issued from within the pro*c !

> ----------
> From: Surya Rao[SMTP:surya.rao_at_reuters.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2000 6:30 PM
> To: oracledba_at_quickdoc.co.uk
> Subject: **Buffer retention in cache to address disk reads problem
> Sensitivity: Confidential
>
> List,
>
> On our prod server, we had instances of high disk i/o - as high
> as 80% on one disk. We then relocated one table to another disk.
> Now this disk is being subjected to the high disk i/o
>
> I trawled through v$sqlarea and found one SQL being called from
> a pro*c application with a very large number of executions and
> a even higher number of disk reads. This pro*c happens to be
> a daemon process constantly running this SQL, every 3 seconds.
> If records match its 'select' criteria, it does some action.
>
> the cecking frequency cannot be increased. It has to check every
> 3 seconds.
>
> Seems that this table buffers are being aged out too fast. What steps
> must I take to ensure that this table is NEVER aged out from buffer and
> so never needs to access the disk. This table has about 3000 records
> at any given point of time. New ones are inserted at about 200 per day
> and also deleted at the same rate.
>
> Is 'cache' attribute for such a table recommended? Even if I do 'cache'
> it, how should I then go about sizing my buffer pool?
>
> Am i barking up the wrong tree and should be doing some thing else to
> address this problem?
>
> This prod server is running Oracle 7.3.2
>
> _TIA_
>
>
> surya
> -------
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> Visit our Internet site at http://www.reuters.com
>
> Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual
> sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be
> the views of Reuters Ltd.
>
> --------
> If you're bored, then visit the list's website: http://www.lazydba.com
> (updated daily)
> to unsubscribe, send a blank email to oracledba-unsubscribe_at_quickdoc.co.uk
> to subscribe send a blank email to oracledba-subscribe_at_quickdoc.co.uk
Received on Tue Sep 05 2000 - 23:41:34 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US