Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> SGA is bigger in Oracle 8.1.6 as compared to 8.1.5 or 8.0.4
> Can I reduce java_pool_size to 0M?
>
> We are using java applications which connect to
> oracle 8.1.6 but we are not using webdb.. It's
> all written outside oracle. We are just
> using database as repository.
>
> Let me know how java_pool_size is going to help me..
>
> Thanks
>
>
> --- Steve Adams <steve.adams_at_ixora.com.au> wrote:
> > Hello Long,
> >
> > 8.1.x has a 20M Java pool by default, but 8.1.5
> does
> > not make it visible.
> > If you are not using Java in the database
> > explicitly,
> > it is safe to reduce the java_pool_size to 1M.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Steve Adams
> > http://www.ixora.com.au/
> > http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/orinternals/
> > http://www.christianity.net.au/
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > Long
> > Sent: Monday, 24 July 2000 17:44
> > To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have just upgraded some databases from 804 and
> 815
> > to 816 on Solaris.
> > After the upgrade I notice that the SGA of each db
> > is about 24MB bigger
> > although I have not changed the size of db buffer,
> > shared pool or redo logs
> > (basically the same init.ora file with a few
> > obsolete parameters removed).
> > "show sga" under svrmgrl indicates that the change
> > is in the variable part
> > of the SGA.
> >
> > Anyone observes the same thing? Any way that I can
> > reduce the memory
> > allocation to the variable part of teh SGA?
> >
> > Long
> > --
> > Author: Nguyen, Long
> > INET: Long.Nguyen_at_its.csiro.au
> >
> > Fat City Network Services -- (858) 538-5051
> FAX:
> > (858) 538-5051
> > San Diego, California -- Public Internet
> > access / Mailing Lists
> >
>