Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: Re : 4 disks.......

Re: Re : 4 disks.......

From: Gaja Krishna Vaidyanatha <gajav_at_yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2000 14:53:19 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <10562.112335@fatcity.com>


Aldi,

I don't understand what your application engineer means by "table scans and index look-ups are done separately". Indexes are used to get to blocks of data in a table. So in an application that has range scans, the indexes and the table blocks are read one after the other and the overhead of moving the disk head back and forth in seeking, can and will cause significant I/O bottlenecks. I'd say in the least you will have to separate DATA and INDX, but with 4 disks, data redundancy becomes an issue.

So go back and negotiate with damagement for more disks, get a good level of hardware support, document the risks and share it with damagement, put the db in archivelog mode, take backups that keep the Mean Time To Recover (MTTR) to an acceptable time, configure your database buffer cache optimally (within reason) to reduce I/O when possible, re-write any "SQL from the Crypt" and pray your disks stay up. Hope you have more disks to place your online redo logs, archived logs and other stuff. May the force be with you....;-)

Cheers,

Gaja.


Gaja Krishna Vaidyanatha
Director, I-O Management Products
Quest Software Inc.
(972)-304-1170
gajav_at_yahoo.com

"Opinions and views expressed are my own and not of Quest" Received on Tue Jul 18 2000 - 16:53:19 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US