Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: Index Rebuilds and Extents
Hi,
If you are rebuilding nightly I would choose to go for one extent no matter if they are uniform extent sizes.
I do a similar thing here where I drop all indexes, coalesce the index tablespace and then rebuild them all. This works because the database is small, but I can imagine that on a huge database a nightly window is not enough for index rebuilds.
Jack
Lisa_Koivu_at_gelco.com_at_fatcity.com on 05/05/2000 05:28:00 PM
Please respond to ORACLE-L_at_fatcity.com
Sent by: root_at_fatcity.com
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <ORACLE-L_at_fatcity.com>
cc:
Subject: Index Rebuilds and Extents
Hello everyone, happy Friday!
I am overhauling an index rebuild script. The indexes in this script are dropped and rebuilt nightly. Yesterday when I was revisiting storage, my goal was to see if I could get the minimum number of extents possible when rebuilding each index, so I re-set my initial extent size to be large enough, in some cases 150M (non partitioned). However after doing so I began to wonder, am I exacerbating fragmentation by doing this? Even if each index is dropped and rebuilt nightly?
So here's my question to you:
What's better: Having an index all in one extent or having uniform extents in the tablespace that the indexes reside in? After thinking about it I'm beginning to lean toward uniform extents.
Your input is appreciated.
Thanks
Lisa
-- Author: INET: Lisa_Koivu_at_gelco.com Fat City Network Services -- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051 San Diego, California -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists -------------------------------------------------------------------- To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).Received on Mon May 08 2000 - 03:24:25 CDT
===================================================================
De informatie verzonden met dit E-mail bericht is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Gebruik van deze informatie door anderen dan de geadresseerde is verboden. Openbaarmaking, vermenigvuldiging, verspreiding en/of verstrekking van deze informatie aan derden is niet toegestaan. Ernst & Young staat niet in voor de juiste en volledige overbrenging van de inhoud van een verzonden E-mail, noch voor tijdige ontvangst daarvan.
===================================================================
The information contained in this communication is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and others authorised to receive it. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Ernst & Young is neither liable for the proper and complete transmission of the information contained in this communication nor for any delay in its receipt.
![]() |
![]() |