LOG_BUFFER - Selects? [message #64884] |
Wed, 25 February 2004 06:05  |
Xenofon Grigoriadis
Messages: 33 Registered: May 2002
|
Member |
|
|
Hi.
We have performance problems with Ora9 on a Linux cluster. One thing I consider is configuring oracle to run with bigger LOG_BUFFER.
Question: Does the LOG_BUFFER parameter perhaps also influence SELECT-statement performance. What if your use sorts and fill temp-space? What about the dictionaries which have to be kept up to date? Isn't all that being also logged in the redo log?
Thanks in advance for the help.
Grigoriadis
|
|
|
Re: LOG_BUFFER - Selects? [message #64885 is a reply to message #64884] |
Wed, 25 February 2004 09:39   |
Thiru
Messages: 1089 Registered: May 2002
|
Senior Member |
|
|
temp extents do not get logged. Data dictionary updates do get logged,but is minimal. In essence,Select performance shouldnt get influenced by log_buffer size directly.
-Thiru
|
|
|
|