set newname vs db_file_name_convert [message #529699] |
Wed, 02 November 2011 10:11 |
|
BeefStu
Messages: 208 Registered: October 2011
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Can somebody explain the difference between set newname and
db_file_name_convert.
I have used db_file_name_convert for my active clones since
my directory structures don't match.
1) When would one use set newname?
2) Does set newname take precedence over db_file_name_convert or vice a versa?
Lastly can somebody provide an simple of example of how to
pass in a script to RMAN that uses set newname.
Thanks in advance to all who answer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: set newname vs db_file_name_convert [message #529710 is a reply to message #529709] |
Wed, 02 November 2011 10:55 |
|
Mahesh Rajendran
Messages: 10708 Registered: March 2002 Location: oracleDocoVille
|
Senior Member Account Moderator |
|
|
set newname should supercede over db_file_name_convert
Edit:
Seems I ignored you second question and not explicit on first.
>> 1) When would one use set newname?
Difference is in restriction. With OMF, db_file_name_convert will not work.
And "Set newname" is more flexible (for scripting) with multiple directories.
>>2) Does set newname take precedence over db_file_name_convert or vice a versa?
set newname should supercede over db_file_name_convert, as this is called from rman within "run" command.
[Updated on: Wed, 02 November 2011 10:59] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|