Re: normalization review
From: landonkelsey <u36972_at_uwe>
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 04:33:27 GMT
Message-ID: <774dd9e1cf7eb_at_uwe>
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 04:33:27 GMT
Message-ID: <774dd9e1cf7eb_at_uwe>
location depends only on the telephone number not on the entire primary key
However if the telephone were a cellphone, there would be no violation!
Look at the Boyce Codd normalization principle
landonkelsey wrote:
>2 is violated ...why?
>
>>> What normal form is violated here?
>>> What could fix the problem?
>[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>>
>>No form is violated.
Received on Mon Aug 27 2007 - 06:33:27 CEST