Re: matrix encoding IS adjacency list
From: Marshall Spight <marshall.spight_at_gmail.com>
Date: 19 Sep 2005 21:28:04 -0700
Message-ID: <1127190484.053528.295470_at_f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
> Which is equivalent to saying: "Let's represent a node with both
> materialized path and truncated path". Surely, there is a referential
> integrity constraint between these two columns. The point is that you
> artificially made that second column.
Date: 19 Sep 2005 21:28:04 -0700
Message-ID: <1127190484.053528.295470_at_f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
Vadim Tropashko wrote:
>
> Which is equivalent to saying: "Let's represent a node with both
> materialized path and truncated path". Surely, there is a referential
> integrity constraint between these two columns. The point is that you
> artificially made that second column.
Marshall Received on Tue Sep 20 2005 - 06:28:04 CEST