Re: One Ring to Bind Them
From: Anthony W. Youngman <wol_at_thewolery.demon.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2004 22:26:19 +0100
Message-ID: <tIsVvtI7dc6AFwO5_at_thewolery.demon.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2004 22:26:19 +0100
Message-ID: <tIsVvtI7dc6AFwO5_at_thewolery.demon.co.uk>
In message <40dd679f$0$37789$e4fe514c_at_news.xs4all.nl>, mAsterdam
<mAsterdam_at_vrijdag.org> writes
>Anthony W. Youngman wrote:
>
>> I would love the *ability* to enforce typing,
>> I just don't think it should be *mandatory*.
>
>With mandatory type enforcement, what prevents
>you from using types that are not very restrictive?
>IOW: Mandatory soup isn't eaten as hot as it is served
>(extended dutch saying).
You mean declaring stuff as "variant"? Fine!
I just think of my Fortran days when I *chose* to use the "declare all variables" switch. I just think that enforcing strict typing is as bad as no typing at all (and "variant" is a nice middle ground - "this variable is explicitly untyped" :-)
Cheers,
Wol
-- Anthony W. Youngman - wol at thewolery dot demon dot co dot uk HEX wondered how much he should tell the Wizards. He felt it would not be a good idea to burden them with too much input. Hex always thought of his reports as Lies-to-People. The Science of Discworld : (c) Terry Pratchett 1999Received on Mon Jul 05 2004 - 23:26:19 CEST