Re: Table Join
From: Michael Austin <maustin_at_firstdbasource.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 16:26:44 -0500
Message-ID: <za7Fl.24633$Ws1.4002_at_nlpi064.nbdc.sbc.com>
joel garry wrote:
> On Apr 14, 11:51 am, Palooka <nob..._at_nowhere.com> wrote:
<snip>
> It might have been slick to use user_tab_columns to generate the sql
> dynamically. Of course, sick might be the better word. Peformance
> would likely suck, if it's not a one-time thing. So it could be a so
> slick sick sucky sql select, since Schaeffer solicited some site. :-)
>
> jg
> --
> _at_home.com is bogus.
> http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2006/06/the_newbies_gui.html?entry_id=1510938
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 16:26:44 -0500
Message-ID: <za7Fl.24633$Ws1.4002_at_nlpi064.nbdc.sbc.com>
joel garry wrote:
> On Apr 14, 11:51 am, Palooka <nob..._at_nowhere.com> wrote:
<snip>
> It might have been slick to use user_tab_columns to generate the sql
> dynamically. Of course, sick might be the better word. Peformance
> would likely suck, if it's not a one-time thing. So it could be a so
> slick sick sucky sql select, since Schaeffer solicited some site. :-)
>
> jg
> --
> _at_home.com is bogus.
> http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2006/06/the_newbies_gui.html?entry_id=1510938
LOL!!!!!!! Received on Tue Apr 14 2009 - 16:26:44 CDT