Re: NFS vs RAW for ASM

On May 25, 4:51 pm, DA Morgan <damor..._at_psoug.org> wrote:
> orcl..._at_gmail.com wrote:
> > Has anyone done any benchmarks to compare performance of ASM using RAW
> > partitions vs. NFS (especially NFS on Netapp)?
>
> > A Netapp 3070 is coming my way in about a month so I can't do any
> > testing ahead of time but wondering what anyone else could share.
>
> NFS mount will likely be a bit slower than ASM on RAW but there is more
> to the equation than that.
>
> NetApp's NFS has no issues with respect to device persistence.
>
> NetApp's NFS is essentially plug-and-play. Total configuration time
> should be an hour or two.
>
> Fewer moving parts.
>
> That said ... which is the better choice depends on what you are going
> to do with it.
> --
> Daniel A. Morgan
> University of Washington
> damor..._at_x.washington.edu
> (replace x with u to respond)
> Puget Sound Oracle Users Groupwww.psoug.org

i recomend you to visit http://kevinclosson.wordpress.com/ you will find there also some link to
documented benchmarks.

Bye
 Cristian Cudizio

http://oracledb.wordpress.com
http://cristiancudizio.wordpress.com Received on Fri May 25 2007 - 09:56:12 CDT