Re: Musings on 'new' OFA standard

From: EdStevens <quetico_man_at_yahoo.com>
Date: 20 Dec 2006 09:55:10 -0800
Message-ID: <1166637310.696704.326090@t46g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>

DA Morgan wrote:
> EdStevens wrote:
> > DA Morgan wrote:
> >> EscVector wrote:
> > <snip>
> > >
> >>> I don't like that grid installs on 10.1 by default even though it lists
> >>> as 10.2. I have an uneasy feeling with this.
> >> I caught that too and made it part of the Grid Control class we teach
> >> here at PSOUG. It would seem the person developing the text for OUI
> >> wasn't in on what actually was tested and shipped.
> >>
> > <snip>
> >
> > That's something else that was buzzing around the periphery of my
> > thinking when I started this discussion. We finally got the
> > opportunity to do a fresh install of Grid on a box dedicated to that,
> > and have been struggling with this 10.1 vs. 10.2 install/upgrade/patch.
> > (The other oracle guy here has been in the driver's seat on this
> > particular project.) Would you mind expanding a bit on that, either
> > here or a pointer do some doc you have on your PSOUG site or elsewhere?

>

> Glad to expand on it either on-line or off. But I'm not sure what it is
> you would like expanded (or expounded <g>).
> --
> Daniel A. Morgan
> University of Washington
> damorgan_at_x.washington.edu
> (replace x with u to respond)
> Puget Sound Oracle Users Group
> www.psoug.org

Crystal ball out for repair? <vbg>

I confess I'm on a bit of a fishing expedition with that question. I know that installs that purported to be one version installed something else ... like a 10.2 OEM createing a 10.1 repository database. On an earlier installation we had an agent that identified itself as 10.1.something -- I forgot the exact version -- and when we tried to locate the media to do another installation Oracle claimed that exact version didn't exist. Received on Wed Dec 20 2006 - 11:55:10 CST