Re: ORA-1555 snapshot too old: why?

DA Morgan wrote:
> joel garry wrote:
> >
> > They would likely find Note:174782.1, tell him someone else was
> > updating an object so Oracle wouldn't be able to make a read-consistent
> > view of the data for exp, and to use consistent=n as a workaround.
>
> I looked for that and didn't find it. You obviously used better
> search criteria than I.

KISS: ora-1555 consistent=Y

Niall's point about undo retention not being guaranteed may be a better answer.

jg

--
@home.com is bogus.  "all the tie's going to do is cut off the flow of
blood to your brain." - Al Shugart 1931-2006.  May he peacefully rotate
at high speed for eternity.
http://www.siliconvalley.com/mld/siliconvalley/rss/16233310.htm?source=rss&channel=siliconvalley_rss