Re: Oracle slowed down

From: ianal Vista <ianal_vista_at_hotmail.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 14:53:31 GMT
Message-ID: <Xns97AD50524AA8Aianalvistahotmailcom@70.169.32.36>

"Bob Jones" <email_at_me.not> wrote in news:ggr2g.62833$F_3.20420 @newssvr29.news.prodigy.net:

>
> "Frank van Bortel" <frank.van.bortel_at_gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:e2dbje$i9k$2_at_news3.zwoll1.ov.home.nl...

>> Bob Jones wrote:
>>>
>>> I completely agree with you. There is no fixed ratio to shoot for, but 
>>> 20%
>>> is unacceptable for DW or OLTP.
>>>
>>
>> Really - why? What does 20% mean?
>>

>
> It means you have only 20% reads comming from memory. Do you think the
> performance will be good for this number?
>
>
>

Yes, it can be good/acceptable.

Quantify "good". Received on Sat Apr 22 2006 - 09:53:31 CDT