Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Intermittend ORA-12519, TNS:no appropriate service handler found
Robert Klemme schrieb:
> Sybrand Bakker wrote:
>
>>On 24 Feb 2006 11:35:34 -0800, "shortcutter_at_googlemail.com" >><shortcutter_at_googlemail.com> wrote: >> >> >>>Second, it was explained that the >>>error will occur if "processes" is set too low. Third, the parameter >>>"processes" is derived from "parallel_max_servers" (indicated by >>>online doc, and you cannot change it directly via EM). >> >>Your understanding is incorrect. Processes doesn't derive from >>parallel_max_servers at all.
Sybrand is in my opinion correct.
First, the doc states "PROCESSES" is not derived from
"PARALLEL_MAX_SERVERS", but only its *default value* - it means, it take
place only if you don't have the value for "PROCESSES" specified ( which
is IMO anyway bad idea, especially, if you have more than one database
on the machine - you should specify this parameter)
Second, the from you cited description of "PROCESSES" is similar in the
documentation 8i - 10gR1, but in 10gR2 default value is described as "40
to operating system-dependent".
I tested on 9.2 with parallel_max_servers set to 0,10,100,1000 and
processes unset - got every time 30 as default value for processes. The
same test on 10gR2 showed me 40 ( as per docs ). I'll check it for other
plattforms/releases for sure, but i tend to believe right now - there is
a documentation bug regarding default value for "PROCESSES" which is
fixed in 10gR2.
Best regards
Maxim Received on Mon Feb 27 2006 - 04:23:29 CST