Re: Oracle RAC for scalability or High Availability only

From: DA Morgan <damorgan_at_psoug.org>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 12:49:36 -0800
Message-ID: <1140036570.690643@jetspin.drizzle.com>

Mladen Gogala wrote:

> On Tue, 14 Feb 2006 16:47:56 -0800, DA Morgan wrote:
>
>

>>But more importantly. You only have one box and zero failover. So double
>>the cost on your side, make that 2x10CPU boxes and be sure you have the
>>EE licenses for them. Then add DataGuard for failover.

>
>
> Why? I work for a marketing company that doesn't have critical data.

Then you've no need for HA technology.

> RAC is not universal answer.

Of course.

> The number 42 is.

No question about it.

-- 
Daniel A. Morgan
http://www.psoug.org
damorgan_at_x.washington.edu
(replace x with u to respond)

Received on Wed Feb 15 2006 - 14:49:36 CST