HansF wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Nov 2005 14:30:14 +0100, Frank van Bortel wrote:
>
>
>>HansF wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, 23 Nov 2005 16:21:05 -0800, blarut wrote:
>>>
>>>All you have to do is find the conversion between milliBleem and
>>>microsecond. Unfortunately, that conversion is variable and is entirely
>>>dependent on the statement, the database size, the optimizer, the
>>
>>Now, you can say that, but I distinctly remember my old friend Albert
>>to mention something about the relativity of all that.
>>Imagine a parallel universe, and look at a Bleem from the side,
>>whilst someone else looks at you and the Bleem from the other
>>side.
>>The bottom line is, your statement may *seems* to take longer
>>(and thus making the conversion factor a variable), than mine,
>>whereas in reality (ok, *what* reality?!?) both statements
>>take exactly the same amount of R, making Bleem a constant.
>>All you need to find is the (correct) parallel universe.
>
>
>
> Exagactly my point - all you need is the simple pan-dimensional
> spatio-temporal tensor function defined and you can perform the
> transformation between these realities. As my math prof used to say, the
> student can prove for himself the intuitive connection between the two
> points. (To the OP, near as I can gather, it's a 9x9 tensor using the
> dependencies mentioned in the previous reply.)
>
:) it's weekend; it took me a seven-and-a-half-hour drive for a
200 km trip; I've been running 12/13 hour days the last week (excluding
driving time...) - I'm not myself, but parallel in another universe.
--
Regards,
Frank van Bortel
Top-posting is one way to shut me up...
Received on Sat Nov 26 2005 - 13:06:21 CST
