Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Migration Workbench (OMWB) vs SQL Loader

Re: Migration Workbench (OMWB) vs SQL Loader

From: Frank van Bortel <fvanbortel_at_netscape.net>
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 18:10:31 +0100
Message-ID: <d1s7on$r5h$3@news6.zwoll1.ov.home.nl>


Ronald Rood wrote:

> On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 12:37:21 +0100, krislioe_at_gmail.com wrote
> (in article <1111491441.055078.165790_at_o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>):
> 
> 

>>Hi All,
>>
>>I am migrating SQL Server 2000 (Windows 2000) data into Oracle 9i on
>>AIX. The table structure is changed in Oracle, but not very
>>significantly.
>>
>>The options are using Migration Workbench (OMWB) or SQL Loader.
>>
>>Could anybody please tell me, what are the cases / reason to decide
>>whether to use OMWB or SQL Loader ??
>>
>>Thank you for your help,
>>Krist
>>
> 
> 
> OMWB works good. Be sure to check the datatype mappings, some tend to default 
> to LONG where we expect LOBs or maybe even varchar2. Loader looks like a lot 
> of work to me, in that case I would prefer to use pl/sql over a db link.
> 

Loader is not a lot of work - OMWB will generate the data in flat files, the control files, and the batch to load all data.

-- 
Regards,
Frank van Bortel
Received on Wed Mar 23 2005 - 11:10:31 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US