CC wrote:
> SuSE w/o a doubt. I've been using both since version 1 and historically
> SuSE has been more stable from release to relase. Also now that their
> owned by Novell (creators of the most robust network operating system
> ever created, for its time. Yea it sucks to maintain but there are
> still scores of sites still running it. You can't argue with uptime.)
> you can bet that its going to get even more rock solid, their support
> will be affordable and reliable, and etc... I persoanlly think Sun
> would best be served in trying to aquire Novell..
>
> If I had to stake my career on a decision of which to use, SuSE w/o a
> doubt. (SLES 9)
>
> Just my 2 bits. I've used both pretty extensively in the IT trenches
> and from experiences based on real-world enterpise use, I believe SuSE
> is the safer bet. (I was running production services on Linux as early
> as 1998 at one company)
>
> Of course you could always brave the products offered by "Ive Been
> Mislead".
That may be, but if you are banking on support, Oracle's commitment to
support AS/ES on any platform or driver supported by Red Hat hasn't been
matched for SuSE.
Received on Wed Mar 02 2005 - 18:07:00 CST
