Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Need help on MTS configuration
Howard,
Yes, The INSTANCE_NAME has to be set otherwise the instance name is
registered as "@" by the listener.
Even if ORA_SID (the logical name that does the same job as the Unix
variable ORACLE_SID) is set.
$ lsnrctl service @ has 1 service handler(s) DEDICATED SERVER established:0 refused:0 LOCAL SERVER
and...
$ sqlplus user/pwd_at_inercs
SQL*Plus: Release 8.1.7.0.0 - Production on Tue Oct 26 15:30:37 2004
(c) Copyright 2000 Oracle Corporation. All rights reserved.
ERROR:
ORA-12500: TNS:listener failed to start a dedicated server process
INIT.ORA
mts_dispatchers = "(PROTOCOL=TCP)(DISPATCHERS=1)" mts_max_dispatchers = 3 mts_servers = 4
TNSNAMES.ORA
INERCS.WORLD =
(DESCRIPTION =
(ADDRESS_LIST =
(ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = TCP)(HOST = HELIOS)(PORT = 1526))
)
(CONNECT_DATA =
(SERVICE_NAME = INERCS.WORLD) (SERVER = DEDICATED)
Btw, I noticed that the alias names must also have the .WORLD in tnsnames.ora (not just the service names need it). What's all about the domains? What purpose do they serve? Certainly here they're just cumbersome.
As for the hanging problem, the TAR is still in "Work In Progress" status. I was told there are many bugs in 8i that will not be fixed (even if the desupport date is officially 2 months from now). If nothing else works I will try to use a 9.2 listener and see if that helps. I'm waiting for another Oracle fix before I can (re)install 9i. I can't upgrade my db right now, must wait for the vendor software to be upgraded as well (soon).
Thanks !
-- Syltrem OpenVMS 7.3-1 + Oracle 8.1.7.4 http://pages.infinit.net/syltrem (OpenVMS related web site, en français) ---zulu is not in my email address--- "Howard J. Rogers" <hjr_at_dizwell.com> a écrit dans le message de news:417e9f75$0$21703$afc38c87_at_news.optusnet.com.au... > Syltrem wrote: > > > LOCAL_LISTENER=ZZZRCS > > MTS_DISPATCHERS="(PROTOCOL=TCP)(DISPATCHERS=1)" > > > > Works great ! > > Many thanks. > > > > > Crikey! That's a short reply to an extremely long-winded post, but whatever: > I'm glad it's sorted!! > > Just out of interest: are you still saying that INSTANCE_NAME is compulsory > on OpenVMS? Or has that resolved itself now, too? It's just that I'd like > to not mislead any more OpenVMSers in the future if at all possible. > > :-) > HJRReceived on Tue Oct 26 2004 - 14:37:18 CDT
![]() |
![]() |