Re: Can I create a database via oracle client?

"Goran" <goran99_remove_at_yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<ck1j99$sqq$1_at_fegnews.vip.hr>...
> "David Fitzjarrell" <fitzjarrell_at_cox.net> wrote in message
> news:9711ade0.0410060808.174cd655_at_posting.google.com...
> > "it025" <noone_at_never.land> wrote in message
> news:<ck07j6$rva$1_at_fegnews.vip.hr>...
> > > Goran
> > >
> > > Groucho Marx once said:
> > > "Never argue with an i....t - he will drag you down to his level and
> beat
> > > you with experience."
> > >
> > > Kindly stop waisting company time on educating amateurs and get back to
> > > work.
> > >
> > > M.Sirovica
> > > DBA Team Leader
> > > VIPnet Telecom
> > >
> >
> > He is, apparently, wasting company time here, as his post is full of
> > 'ifs' requiring access to the server itself. The original post asked
> > if it was possible to create a database on a server through the client
> > software, and without access to the server at some point, it is not.
> > Period. End of story.
>
> That is exactly what I wrote. You should have read my posts more patiently.
> Since the question was "Can I create a database via oracle client?", I
> corrected Mr. Bakker's replies. Because the answer to that question is
> "Yes". Also it *is not* true that one can't connect to a db server via
> sqlnet without having a database or an instance started. After that it is
> possible to create a database. I suggest you to perform that excercise to
> convince yourself that this can be done.
>
> Maybe you can't imagine the scenario in which this could be useful. I can't
> and we never created any database this way.
> But does the fact that you, Mr Bakker and me don't find that possibility
> useful mean that Mr. Innerebner (for some reason) doesn't need to create a
> db "remotely"? I don't think so.
>
> > Oh, and if you're monitoring his activity, aren't YOU also wasting
> > company time? And, as you will note, it is 'wasting', not 'waisting'.
> > A waste is to use, consume, spend, or expend thoughtlessly or
> > carelessly. A waist is the part of the human trunk between the bottom
> > of the rib cage and the pelvis. Hence, you cannot be 'waisting'
> > anything, much less time.
>
> Oh, thanks you for the english and anatomy lessons. Or was that M.S.'s
> spelling error...?
> I myself never tried to pretend that my english is perfect. Anyway I suppose
> it is far better than your knowledge of our language.
>
> -- Cudim se ljudima koji u ovakvoj situaciji u nedostatku argumenata posegnu
> za tim da nekome ispravljaju gramaticke pogreske.. Mislio sam da samo kod
> nas na balkanu ima cudnih ljudi cudnog mentaliteta :-) --
>
> > reduce frustration. However, Sybrand Bakker is not an idiot. And has
> > posted the correct repsonse several times in this exchange.
>
> Together with several wrong statements. It is not wrong to be wrong about
> something, you see. It is wrong to be wrong and not to be able to admitt
> that, and to try to "defend" yourself with arrogancy.
>
> Bytheway.. I suppose you ment to write "response". I can't find "repsonse"
> in any english dictionary :-)
>
> > Apparently the idiot is your employee who continues to propose
>
> Thank you, Mr. Fitzjarrell. Nice to meet you, too :-)
> But please, before ending this discussion, this time try to read original
> poster's question and all of my replies. Thanks.
> You migh even change your mind, though I don't really care.
>
> > Now, I would also suggest you get back to work, and stop playing on
> > comp.databases.oracle.server.
>
> Now I see. You consider this newsgroup as your and Mr Bakker's own private
> playground :-)
>
> Excuse me for wasting your time and of course for my imperfect english :)
> And you're right, we're all wasting our company time in this thread.
>
> Regards,
> Goran Dokmanovic
> Senior DBA
> VIPNet Telecom

I must admit the 'idiot' inferrence was uncalled for, and hereby retract said comment. My apologies for writing in haste.

David Fitzjarrell Received on Thu Oct 07 2004 - 09:08:07 CDT