Howard J. Rogers wrote:
> Well, you might notice that Mike has does his usual trick. He won't actually
> discuss anything with me except in the context of defending Burleson. But
> elsewhere in the thread, he has conceded that he strongly advised against
> using buffered I/O and that it can be "switched off through simple mount
> options". Uh huh.
>
> So there you have it, the deep technical discussion you were so keen to
> listen in on.
>
> Wasn't really worth it, was it?
>
> Regards
> HJR
Beats the heck out of what happened last time so actually I am quite
pleased.
--
Daniel Morgan
http://www.outreach.washington.edu/ext/certificates/oad/oad_crs.asp
http://www.outreach.washington.edu/ext/certificates/aoa/aoa_crs.asp
damorgan_at_x.washington.edu
(replace 'x' with a 'u' to reply)
Received on Wed Mar 31 2004 - 20:54:28 CST
