Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Article about supposed "murky" future for Oracle
Serge Rielau wrote:
> Daniel Morgan wrote:
>
>> Serge Rielau wrote: >> >>>> Not one of the list of products is capable of something as basic >>>> to Oracle as partitioning. I'd like to see the day when 1.5 peta >>>> is loaded into any of them: Oracle currently supports two such >>>> databases. >>>> >>> CNN runs DB2 CM peta-sized. >>> http://www.internetnews.com/bus-news/article.php/749871 >>> >>> Or are you trying to tell us there is an OLTP system in that size. It >>> sure isn't on WinterCorp's list. >>> Database size is a funny business to measure. Just remember the SQL >>> Server 7 "terra-server". >>> >>> Cheers >>> Serge >> >> >> >> Where did I use the letters "OLTP"? >> >> I'm not sure the sizes at Amex, Visa and MasterCard. But I would >> expect they are keeping their OLTP sides smaller than that. >>
To the best of my knowledge the ... some day year in the future ... statement is correct. To the best of my knowledge there are no petabyte sized DB2 databases. That doesn't mean one doesn't exist somewhere but if so I've not seen the announcement. And that is not the kind of thing the men in blue would keep quiet about any more than the Oracle folks when they proudly proclaim having two of them.
BTW: It isn't just documents that can make a database large. ;-)
-- Daniel Morgan http://www.outreach.washington.edu/ext/certificates/oad/oad_crs.asp http://www.outreach.washington.edu/ext/certificates/aoa/aoa_crs.asp damorgan_at_x.washington.edu (replace 'x' with a 'u' to reply)Received on Mon Mar 29 2004 - 08:47:39 CST