Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: User datafiles and index on separate disks

Re: User datafiles and index on separate disks

From: Goran <goran99_makni_at_yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 15:51:10 +0200
Message-ID: <blc1oe$i8e$1@fegnews.vip.hr>

"Howard J. Rogers" <howardjr2000_at_yahoo.com.au> wrote in message news:3f793720$0$1691$afc38c87_at_news.optusnet.com.au...
> Peter wrote:
>
> > Is it a must to place datafiles, undo segments and table index on
> > separate disks? If not, what are the benefits of doing so?
> >
> > Thanks
>
>
> Please go to www.google.com and search the archives there for a thread in
> this very newsgroup called 'Oracle Myths'. A number of hits will appear,
> but you want the one with about 149 posts in the thread.
>
> It *was* a very long-running argument.
>
> Short story: indexes and tables do not need to be separated for
 performance
> reasons, but probably do for management convenience. Undo segments should

This is not (always) true.
Please try to perform few simple real-world measurements and you'll find out that *whatever* files (tablespaces) you separate between (physical) disks and no matter what you do with them, you'll always gain some (or significant) performance gain compared to the files on the same (physical) disk.

Regards... Received on Tue Sep 30 2003 - 08:51:10 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US