Regarding the original question about NFS/NAS etc. see Oracle Technet
for info on what Oracle does and doesn't support and why. A search on
Oracle Storage Compatibility Program (OSCP), NFS, or NAS will yield lots
of white papers and other info.
fdp
Fred Pierce
Avialantic.com fpierce_at_avialantic.com
www.avialantic.com
Tanel Poder wrote:
> In My (not so humble) Opinion.
>
> I use: www.acronymfinder.com
>
> Tanel.
>
> "somez72" <somez72_at_chollian.net> wrote in message
> news:bgurqp$jgh$1_at_news1.kornet.net...
>
>>what does stand for IMO?
>>
>>thanks a lot.
>>
>>"Brian Peasland" <dba_at_remove_spam.peasland.com> wrote in message
>>news:3F326AF7.6631F4DE_at_remove_spam.peasland.com...
>>
>>>People have put Oracle databases on NAS, but IMO, it is not a good idea.
>>>Oracle likes to keep in touch with the datafiles that make up the
>>>database on a pretty regular basis. I've seen where network glitches or
>>>hiccups present problems if the Oracle datafiles are on NAS. And this
>>>can cause the database to crash. So I won't use NAS for Oracle. SAN or
>>>direct attached disk is much better.
>>>
>>>HTH,
>>>Brian
>>>
>>>somez72 wrote:
>>>
>>>>hello.
>>>> NAS based on linux ( using samba (CIFS service ) or NFS ) can't
>>>
>>store
>>
>>>>oracle Database? is it right?
>>>> I'd like know some reason why NAS is not good for saving oracle
>>>>Database?
>>>>
>>>> but, I heard NAS can store MS-SQL data base? is it right?
>>>>
>>>>thank you.
>>>
>>>--
>>>===================================================================
>>>
>>>Brian Peasland
>>>dba_at_remove_spam.peasland.com
>>>
>>>Remove the "remove_spam." from the email address to email me.
>>>
>>>
>>>"I can give it to you cheap, quick, and good. Now pick two out of
>>> the three"
>>
>>
>
>
Received on Mon Aug 11 2003 - 08:28:27 CDT
