Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: MySQL 4

Re: MySQL 4

From: Maximus <qweqwe_at_qwqwewq.com>
Date: Sat, 09 Aug 2003 22:51:48 GMT
Message-ID: <8WeZa.715865$Vi5.16356522@news1.calgary.shaw.ca>


Postgress has always been superior to MySQL in functionality, it has support for foreign keys, triggers, and a procedural language. Where MySQL has been always been superior, it's very difficult to corrupt a MySQL database unless you really really try.

"Charles Goehring" <cgoehrin_at_san.rr.com> wrote in message news:dP9Za.19530$8N.1058850_at_twister.socal.rr.com...
>
>
> There is always Postgress and Firebird. I read somewhere that Postgress
> has surpassed MySql on functionality. I couldn't get it running on
> Windows 2000 though (it seams to be UNIX-centric). The Firebird worked
> and I've been using it with Java for some development work. For
> low-cost projects there are other alternatives.
>
> Technet.oracle.com allows downloading of the software but the licenses
> that come with them are rather vague.
>
> Chuck
>
>
>
> NorwoodThree wrote:
> > Still no support for:
> >
> > Foreign keys
> > triggers
> > procedures
> >
> > Yup. This is an Oracle killer all right. Yawn.
>
Received on Sat Aug 09 2003 - 17:51:48 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US