Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: MySQL 4

Re: MySQL 4

From: Daniel Morgan <damorgan_at_exxesolutions.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2003 12:53:23 -0700
Message-ID: <3F32AE33.2AA0420@exxesolutions.com>


Maximus wrote:

> "Noons" <wizofoz2k_at_yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
> news:3f3239c9$3$10356$afc38c87_at_news.optusnet.com.au...
> > "Maximus" <qweqwe_at_qwqwewq.com> wrote in message
> news:fznYa.646346$ro6.13862150_at_news2.calgary.shaw.ca...
> >
> > >
> > > MySQL is fast and simple, sometimes you just don't need all that fluff
> that
> > > comes with Oracle.
> >
> >
> > and comes with just about ANY other database that claims
> > to be relational?
> >
> > BTW: fks, triggers and procedures are "fluff"?
> > I've got a suggestion: if you don't want "fluff"
> > like that, try using DBASE4. It should be real
> > cheap now. And it will be "fast and simple".
> > Should beat the crap out of mysql nowadays,
> > with a good P4 processor.
>
> Of course all of that fluff is handy, but as I said, sometimes you just
> don't need it. I utilize both, where cost is a factor I use MySQL, where it
> isn't I use Oracle. If you're on the green, use a putter, if you're on the
> tee, use a driver

Sometimes you don't need relational integrity either I presume.

--
Daniel Morgan
http://www.outreach.washington.edu/extinfo/certprog/oad/oad_crs.asp
damorgan_at_x.washington.edu
(replace 'x' with a 'u' to reply)
Received on Thu Aug 07 2003 - 14:53:23 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US