Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Upgrade to big SUN box or RAC for data warehouse?

Re: Upgrade to big SUN box or RAC for data warehouse?

From: Brian Peasland <dba_at_remove_spam.peasland.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 20:33:37 GMT
Message-ID: <3F2042A1.FABB769B@remove_spam.peasland.com>


This type of I/O waits *can* slow the database down. As always, YMMV. But it can happen.

HTH,
Brian

Ryan Gaffuri wrote:
>
> "Tanel Poder" <tanel@@peldik.com> wrote in message news:<3f1d9a46$1_1_at_news.estpak.ee>...
> > Hi!
> >
> > No, 2 phase commit is used in transactions distributed between different
> > databases.
> > RAC doesn't increase IO per se, but it allows to overcome CPU (and memory)
> > bottleneck, thus allowing more IO to be done. But since you still operate
> > with the same number of disks, they can't service any more IO requests. A
> > disk with average 5ms seek time can service 20 IO requests per second, but
> > if you got more and more requests coming, they will queue up and the queues
> > will grow until you start having problems such are IO timeouts etc..
> >
> > Tanel.
> >
> > "Ryan" <rgaffuri_at_cox.net> wrote in message
> > news:PTfTa.875$5b7.404_at_lakeread01...
> > > why would implementing RAC increase I/O? is that because of the 2 phase
> > > commit? So you have to write to multiple datafiles?
>
> so will this type of increased I/O waits actually slow the database
> down? or will it run at the same performance level?

-- 
===================================================================

Brian Peasland
dba_at_remove_spam.peasland.com

Remove the "remove_spam." from the email address to email me.


"I can give it to you cheap, quick, and good. Now pick two out of
 the three"
Received on Thu Jul 24 2003 - 15:33:37 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US