Re: Inactive sessions

From: Frank <fbortel_at_home.nl>
Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2002 17:12:43 +0100
Message-ID: <3E0DCD7B.3010108@home.nl>

Howard J. Rogers wrote:
> "Frank" <fbortel_at_home.nl> wrote in message news:3E0836A7.4010309_at_home.nl...
>

>>Howard J. Rogers wrote:
>>
>>>I agree they should be. But have you implemented MTS (which will mean
>>

> that
>

>>>you couldn't care?)
>>>
>>>Regards
>>>HJR
>>>
>>
>><snip!>
>>
>>Confusion strikes again - do you mean to say MTS is a bad idea
>>in this case? Not seem many apps installs, but afaik MTS is 'standard'.
>>
>>Grtz, Frank
>>

>
>
> Clearly some incomprehension of the English language. MTS means he wouldn't
> care about stalled sessions, because the server processes would be off being
> busy on behalf of other sessions.
>
> Does that sound like a bad idea to you?
>
> HJR
>
>

No - au contraire: an excellent idea; hence the confusion. miscomprehended the 'you couldn't care less' bit as 'you should have known better than installing MTS' ...

Frank Received on Sat Dec 28 2002 - 10:12:43 CST