How so Daniel?
damorgan <damorgan_at_exesolutions.com> wrote in message news:<3DEF8413.8ED9C7AB_at_exesolutions.com>...
> grjohnson wrote:
>
> > Do you mean your redo logs groups have only one member and then mirror
> > your redo groups at an os level (instead of multiplexing them via
> > oracle, i.e. groups have multiple members on separate disks.) If so,
> > then you have Single point of failure. Because if a redo log becomes
> > corrupt, that corruption is mirrored also.
>
> <snipped>
>
> I highly doubt it. Doing so would bring a database to its knees with every checkpoint.
>
> Daniel Morgan
Received on Sun Dec 08 2002 - 18:32:37 CST
