Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Why PUBLIC SYNONYM is bad ?

Re: Why PUBLIC SYNONYM is bad ?

From: cava123 <cava123_at_noos.fr>
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2002 01:56:19 +0200
Message-ID: <3D0D25A3.FD16FCC7@noos.fr>


Thank You Yong, but is there any security impact with public or private synonyms ?.

Yong Huang a écrit :

> Nuno Souto <nsouto_at_optushome.com.au.nospam> wrote in message news:<3d0bfd7e$0$28008$afc38c87_at_news.optusnet.com.au>...
> >
> > For some good text stuff on public synonyms and their performance impact,
> > see Steve Adam's site: www.ixora.com.au
> > There is a section on newsletters and IIRC the synonym stuff is in one of
> > them.
>
> It's here:
> http://www.ixora.com.au/newsletter/2001_05.htm#synonyms
>
> Steve shows that synonyms, particularly public synonyms, are indeed
> bad in terms of CPU usage. But he said at the beginning "the best way
> to refute such scepticism [i.e. synonyms are bad] is with a
> reproducible test", as if his following test would show otherwise.
>
> Yong Huang
Received on Sun Jun 16 2002 - 18:56:19 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US