Oh well. Just trying to state something factually and with an educational
bent.
Jim
"Nuno Souto" <nsouto_at_optushome.com.au.nospam> wrote in message
news:3ce9ff0c$0$15148$afc38c87_at_news.optusnet.com.au...
> In article <K_iG8.75146$Po6.120173_at_rwcrnsc52.ops.asp.att.net>, you said
> (and I quote):
> > Actually, you misunderstand what Howard is stating. What Howard is
saying
> > is:(chronologically down the page)
>
> No he did not.
>
> You will NEVER get a MSSQL boffin to admit or "understand" a limitation
> of "their" product. Until such limitation is taken away, at which time
> it will be "the first product without that limitation" by definition.
>
> It's a well known fact, seen many times in the past.
>
> Rest assured, he understood PERFECTLY well what you said. Just the usual
> deranged semantics on the way back and one of the many reasons why it's
> not worth chasing it up.
>
>
> --
> Cheers
> Nuno Souto
> nsouto_at_optushome.com.au.nospam
Received on Tue May 21 2002 - 07:53:54 CDT
