Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Newbie's Oracle 9i impression: it sucks

Re: Newbie's Oracle 9i impression: it sucks

From: tojo <TomJordanTojo_at_hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 17:58:18 +0200
Message-ID: <MPG.174df588de5a906898968f@news.t-online.de>

> I am seriously considering dumping Oracle and learning DB2 instead. What do you
> think?
>

I think you used 4) twice in your list.

In article <20020516110809.21498.00000052_at_mb-mv.aol.com>, sqljoe_at_aol.com says...
> I am a MS SQL DBA of five years. Recently, I have been trying to learn Oracle
> 9i on Windows2000. Here is my impression.
>
> 1)Oracle is SLOW on Windows2000, FAR slower than MS SQL 2000
>
> 2)Oracle uses Java interface which, although cross platform, is slow and brings
> out the DOS prompt (which remind of legacy applications) everytime I try to
> open up a GUI.
>
> 3)Believe ir not, Oracle is unstable and unreliable on Windows2000. I had
> Oracle GUI crash on me TWICE already.
>
> 4)Oracle security is overdone. It has multiple layers of security on the
> network level to the application level. Initially, I had a hard time enterting
> any database, and it took me while to setup the security features.
>
> 4)Setting up a Oracle Client is a nightmare. I need to setup a listener, port,
> and separate account\pw for the client. Too much work.
>
> 5)The official Oracle books from the Osbourne press absolutely SUCKS. I have
> read 3 books on Oracle 9i from the Osbourne press and all of them were next to
> useless. Furthermore, there are very few non-Osbourne books on Oracle 9i that I
> can currently buy. This is in stark contract to MS SQL 2000 which has PLENTY of
> GREAT books and documentation (except the ones from OSBOURNE).
>
> 6)Oracle is too complicated. I am willing to bet most Oracle DBA\Developers
> never use at least 20% of Oracle's features in their entire career. It seems
> Oracle has a GUI for every little feature it provides, which makes it seem
> disorganized and a nightmare to manage. I think it has around 20 GUIs!!!!. For
> a database, that is ridiculous.
>
> 7)PL/SQL is overrated. So far, I have seen nothing that PL/SQL can do which
> T-SQL (with temporary tables and cursors) cannot do. Why would anyone want to
> learn a SQL language that is, again, needlessly complicated?
>
> I am seriously considering dumping Oracle and learning DB2 instead. What do you
> think?
>
> Jinsoo
> MCDBA, MCSD, MCSE+I
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Thu May 16 2002 - 10:58:18 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US