Re: Why doesn't Oracle care about Linux as IBM does?

On 16 Aug 2001 23:58:14 -0700, pagesflames_at_usa.net (Dusan Bolek) wrote:

>I want to say that there is nothing like cheap solution in the
>enterprise market. You have to pay big money for support (if you want
>a professional one) and doesn't matter which OS you have.

That's very true. Be it OS, database, whatever. Enterprise market is a totally different kettle.

One of the reasons M$ has never been truly successfull in it: they haven't got the clue yet that an enterprise manager equates cheap with useless and unreliable.

>
>> Using consultans is the rich man's way to do things.
>Yes, indeed.

Yes indeed. It's usually the rich that drive BMW's and live in huge houses. They can afford consultants, because they want the best solutions. As shown by how they live. Nothing wrong with that in my book. Just a different way of getting the job done.

>> Maybe you do, I don't. Anyway, Linux-consultants are much cheaper than
>> Solaris-consultants (or Windows- )
>Even If they're from IBM ? :-)

Ouch! ;-)

Cheers
Nuno Souto
nsouto_at_optushome.com.au.nospam Received on Fri Aug 17 2001 - 06:28:11 CDT