Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: new database
Respones inline
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
On 4/29/00, 1:52:34 PM, GAB <news4_at_REMOVEbaxnet.net> wrote regarding new
database:
> Just installed 8iR2 (8.1.6) on a 2000 machine, all fine so far.
> I noticed it installed a "default" db, no problem. Now we're going to
> transfer a VB application we've had under MSSQL to a REAL db (lol) -
to
> this new ORA machine. Our db will have about 30 tables, with only 1
or
> 2 or those tables with 5k recs or more.
> * Should I create new tablespace(s) for my new app?
It is always a good idea to create additional tablespaces and when
creating users to make their default tablespace something other than
SYSTEM.
> * Should I create a new database altogether or just piggy back on the
> existing db?
Unless you are going to have more than the default number of
datafiles (is it still
29 on 2000 like it was on NT?) you might as well piggyback. The
biggest problem with the default database is that the initialization
parameters default to too small a configuration which leads to, by
Oracle standards, poor performance. Get a good book on database
tuning and tweak them.
> * Should I kill the default database?
No
> * Is there a good MSSQL-Ora translator?
Don't know how good it is, but Oracle does have one. I think it is on technet.
> * Is there a good Access - Ora translator?
Don't know if you have any desire to do so, but you can use Access as a front end to an Oracle database. That way you minimize the impact of change.
> Thanks -
> Greg
Received on Sun Apr 30 2000 - 00:00:00 CDT
![]() |
![]() |