Re: Oracle performance on Windows NT - is it really so bad?!

We're using a Pent Pro 200 with 100Mg Ram and NT 4.0 and Oracle runs like a dream.

Matthew

On Fri, 13 Mar 1998 14:03:17 +0100, aroesch <aroesch_at_raie.de> wrote:

>We migrated our Oracle database to Windows NT to get a hand on
>performance behaviour. We figured out that even on a $20K Intel Server
>with 256 MB RAM Oracle seems to be terribly slow!
>
>Is this what the world expierences using NT as a backend operating
>system - or are we just to dump to install Oracle on NT right? By the
>way, a comparisson with an old $3K Sun Sparc with 128 MB RAM reveiled
>that this machine is yet faster than NT!
>
>Any commnets to this?
>
>
>
Received on Wed Mar 18 1998 - 00:00:00 CST