Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Oracle performance on Windows NT - is it really so bad?!

Re: Oracle performance on Windows NT - is it really so bad?!

From: Terry Dykstra [TeamPS] <no_spam_tdykstra_at_cfol.ab.ca>
Date: 1998/03/13
Message-ID: <01bd4ec6$b4ef1360$3301020a@tdykstra>#1/1

You definitely have something wrong. I run Oracle on Solaris, HP-UX and NT and I'm very pleased with the performance of the Oracle 7.3 Workgroup on NT4. Some things to watch out for: swapspace, setting of server options to either 'mimimize memory used' or 'balanced' (ctrl-panel, network,services,server). And of course the init.ora file.

-- 
Terry Dykstra [TeamPS]
Canadian Forest Oil Ltd.

aroesch <aroesch_at_raie.de> wrote in article <35092E95.61AFCC02_at_raie.de>...

> We migrated our Oracle database to Windows NT to get a hand on
> performance behaviour. We figured out that even on a $20K Intel Server
> with 256 MB RAM Oracle seems to be terribly slow!
>
> Is this what the world expierences using NT as a backend operating
> system - or are we just to dump to install Oracle on NT right? By the
> way, a comparisson with an old $3K Sun Sparc with 128 MB RAM reveiled
> that this machine is yet faster than NT!
>
> Any commnets to this?
>
>
>
>
Received on Fri Mar 13 1998 - 00:00:00 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US