Re: New architecture using Clusterware

From: goran bogdanovic <goran00_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 15:55:13 +0100
Message-ID: <CAGyPXK64RcU9j8zAnZQO8DENKa_6g8HkTO=2FDPFMfmpLQfiZw_at_mail.gmail.com>

we are using Linux, Grid Infrastructure + ASM (5 node cluster) for a HA active/passive databases for over a year. There are some configuration/architecture topics which need closer attention, but when done, works fine.
At the beginning, we have used ACFS for oracle_homes but after some serious issues, we switched back to local homes. OSS finally comes up with workaround for defining resource dependencies and since then we noticed no issue.
So, at the bottom, positive experience, there are some ideas for possible improvements ... but some other time :-)

On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 6:45 PM, Chris King <ckaj111_at_yahoo.ca> wrote:

> I've been following this thread with great interest, as I am also now
> looking for the best way to set up our next environment, which is also not
> a true 24x7, but does need an HA solution. Presently we're also using VCS.
> Here is a list of options mentioned so far in this thread.
> 1. Veritas Cluster Server
> 2. Linux and Oracle Clusterware (Grid + ASM), but not RAC
> 3. Linux and Oracle Clusterware with OCFS2 instead of ASM
> 3. HP ServiceGuard with active/passive clusters
> 4. RAC One Node
> 5. Oracle Virtual Machines (OVM)
>
> Are there any other options or third party solutions worthy of
> consideration? Has anyone run Oracle on VMware vSphere? PolyServe Matrix?
> Or used remote mirroring solutions?
>
> --
> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
>
>

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

Received on Tue Jan 29 2013 - 15:55:13 CET