11g AMM tmpfs vs hugepages for best overall performance
From: Crisler, Jon <Jon.Crisler_at_usi.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 11:56:36 -0400
Message-ID: <56211FD5795F8346A0719FEBC0DB067506E1CDE5_at_mds3aex08.USIEXCHANGE.COM>
Which is better for performance on large Red Hat 5 systems (64gb+ memory, 8+ cpu's) - using 10g style shm settings and hugepages, OR the newer 11g Automatic Memory Manager (which does not support hugepages).
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 11:56:36 -0400
Message-ID: <56211FD5795F8346A0719FEBC0DB067506E1CDE5_at_mds3aex08.USIEXCHANGE.COM>
Which is better for performance on large Red Hat 5 systems (64gb+ memory, 8+ cpu's) - using 10g style shm settings and hugepages, OR the newer 11g Automatic Memory Manager (which does not support hugepages).
The system I am building is a 6 node 11g R1 RAC, memory somewhere between 64gb and 256gb (not sure yet), 8 cpu per node. This machine will support a huge workload.
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Wed Jul 21 2010 - 10:56:36 CDT