Re: Monitoring server
From: Aaron Leonard <aachleon_at_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 13:49:42 -0600
Message-ID: <34f494ce0912111149n4d604929g6836a25a37554493_at_mail.gmail.com>
We're in the process of implementing multiple OMS's to assist with that problem. As we phase out of our homegrown monitoring and rely more on Grid Control, we want to make sure we're getting our alerts. As the OMS piece of grid control has been the most consistent point of failure for us, we expect multiple OMS's to solve most issues regarding our monitoring outages.
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 13:49:42 -0600
Message-ID: <34f494ce0912111149n4d604929g6836a25a37554493_at_mail.gmail.com>
We're in the process of implementing multiple OMS's to assist with that problem. As we phase out of our homegrown monitoring and rely more on Grid Control, we want to make sure we're getting our alerts. As the OMS piece of grid control has been the most consistent point of failure for us, we expect multiple OMS's to solve most issues regarding our monitoring outages.
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 6:04 PM, Ram Raman <veeeraman_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Listers,
>
> While configuring a monitoring server like Grid control server (or any
> other type), how much of High availability or redundancy factors should we
> consider. What happens when the monitoring server itself goes down. I
> am curious to know how it is handled.
>
> Thanks.
>
>
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Fri Dec 11 2009 - 13:49:42 CST