Re: ASM - Active Passive role

From: John Thompson <jhthomp_at_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 10:32:05 -0500
Message-ID: <11d63ad10808150832t5d3027b6ude44e9d70b316caf@mail.gmail.com>


We're prototyping both a Standard Edition and Enterprise Edition cluster at the moment using ASM in active/passive and active/active/passive. Using 11g CRS and ASM and so far it's passed my expectations.

On 8/14/08, Stalin <stalinsk_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> Anyone using ASM/clusterware on single databases in a active-passive
> configuration. Most of our medium sized customer installations are
> single databases in active-passive configuration using sun cluster
> data services for automatic fail over. Wondering if we anyone using
> ASM in this configuration successfully without the sun cluster part. I
> believe you would still need sun cluster for multipathing as ASM
> doesn't support it yet.
>
> Appreciate your inputs.
>
> Thanks
> Stalin
> --
> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
>
>

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Fri Aug 15 2008 - 10:32:05 CDT

Original text of this message