Re: 10g RAC: To have or not to have ORACLE_HOME on the cluster filesystem?
From: Pedro Espinoza <raindoctor_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 11:23:16 -0400
Message-ID: <b86c876f0806090823x50ff6be2p9518e6a94b0fa903@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 11:23:16 -0400
Message-ID: <b86c876f0806090823x50ff6be2p9518e6a94b0fa903@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 8:54 AM, laura pena <lizzpenaorclgrp_at_yahoo.com> wrote:
> Can you guys give me opionions reasons why to have the $ORACLE_HOME product
> on the cluster filesystem?
If you have 7 nodes, you can partition them into 3 groups: 2, 2 and 3, each with a shared $ORACLE_HOME. That way, you can bring each partition down for upgrading. If you have a small cluster, I don't see any purpose in having a shared/clustred $ORACLE_HOME.
> Also - does having ASM and using RAW matter with this question?
No, It doesn't.
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Mon Jun 09 2008 - 10:23:16 CDT