Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: CPU_TIME > ELAPSED_TIME

Re: CPU_TIME > ELAPSED_TIME

From: Niall Litchfield <niall.litchfield_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 08:29:58 +0100
Message-ID: <7765c8970710240029k473ec77v9f4bb89f95a426cc@mail.gmail.com>


hey, I knew that once...

it occurs to me now though that, perhaps fittingly for a commercial company, the rule is the exact opposite of the rule for the workers in the vineyard. I think I can remember that.

On 10/24/07, Daniel Fink <daniel.fink_at_optimaldba.com> wrote:
>
> Elapsed time and CPU time are not measured the same. Elapsed time is a
> stop watch. CPU time is a calendar with the rule that you get credit for
> the full day if you are present when the day starts.
>
> You could be on the job for 10 minutes...but get credit for 24 hours if
> those 10 minutes started precisely at midnight. You could also be on the
> job for 23 hours and 50 minutes...and get no credit for hours because
> you were not on the job when the day started.
>
> Cary Millsap covers this in his book "Optimizing Oracle Performance".
>
> --
> Daniel Fink
>
> Oracle Performance, Diagnosis and Training
>
> OptimalDBA http://www.optimaldba.com
> Oracle Blog http://optimaldba.blogspot.com
>
>
>
> Eagle Fan wrote:
> > yes, I also thought about this possibility before.
> >
> > But this query is very simple, it's doing index unique scan on PK
> > index. buffer gets per execution is only 3.
> >
> > I can't image it run on multiple CPU at one time.
> >
> > What do you think?
>
>
> --
> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
>
>

-- 
Niall Litchfield
Oracle DBA
http://www.orawin.info

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Wed Oct 24 2007 - 02:29:58 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US