Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: RMAN impact

Re: RMAN impact

From: Jared Still <jkstill_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 10:38:46 -0700
Message-ID: <bf46380610300938h6b772100u65f9c79997c6c1df@mail.gmail.com>


On 10/28/06, Mark Brinsmead <pythianbrinsmead_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Nonetheless, I'll stick to my original statement; if you find an Oracle
> database containing a large number of tables with no indexes, somebody
> usually deserves a kick in the butt. (That said, in my wanderings, I have
> actually encountered more than a few databases containing hundreds or tables
> with nary a Primary Key constraint in sight. Of course, had it actually
> been in my power, I probably would have kicked some butts -- I have yet to
> encounter a situation where that lack of primary keys was actually correct
> -- although I can imagine a few where it would be...)
>

Some apps do their own PK enforcement.

Though a number of apps do this, the only one I have personally seen that does so succesfully is SAP. I still don't like it, but there's little I can do about it.

-- 
Jared Still
Certifiable Oracle DBA and Part Time Perl Evangelist

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Mon Oct 30 2006 - 11:38:46 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US