Re: ** keep/pin objects in sga

From: A Joshi <ajoshi977_at_yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 06:57:47 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <20061022135747.53702.qmail@web62406.mail.re1.yahoo.com>

Fuad,

Thanks. So no short cut there. OK. So I guess we still need to do keeping of objects and sql. And put in bind variables. I assume there is some improvement in 9i in handling all this. Is there anything else that can be done to improve the sga usage and avoid its fragmentation and is there way to get advance warning when it is fragmented and could be heading for problems. Thanks

Fuad Arshad <fuadar_at_yahoo.com> wrote:

cursor sharing still has a lot of bugs. it depends on the environment but tom kyte also asked for the use of this only at session level rather than system level

Original Message ---- From: A Joshi <ajoshi977_at_yahoo.com> To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org Sent: Friday, October 20, 2006 3:20:15 PM Subject: ** keep/pin objects in sga

Hi,
For efficient use of shared pool and SGA : On 9i : I assume it is beneficial to keep objects and sql in sga. Or is it not needed on 9i? I think parameter CURSOR SHARING can be set to FORCE as alternative to using bind variables and that will help SGA use but there were issues with it. I assume in 9i it is better. Any body with experience otherwise or any other catch? Thanks for your help.

How low will we go? Check out Yahoo! Messengers low PC-to-Phone call rates.

Want to be your own boss? Learn how on Yahoo! Small Business.

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

Received on Sun Oct 22 2006 - 08:57:47 CDT