Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: Inheriting a "interesting" recovery process

RE: Inheriting a "interesting" recovery process

From: <oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org>
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 12:59:11 -0500
Message-ID: <FB5D3CCFCECC2948B5DCF4CABDBE6697A52025@QTEX1.qg.com>


Excellent! Coming from you, it's worth *tons*. I'm glad you replied, Cary, and I'm glad to finally see the de facto OFA paper.

Now I just need to figure out where I've seen the "oradata" directory slapped under ORACLE_BASE or ORACLE_HOME.

Thanks!
Rich

-----Original Message-----
From: Cary Millsap [mailto:cary.millsap_at_hotsos.com] Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 12:51 PM
To: Jesse, Rich; stephenbooth.uk_at_gmail.com; jkstill_at_gmail.com Cc: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
Subject: RE: Inheriting a "interesting" recovery process

I would agree that .log is a dangerous extension for files that you want *not* to get picked off by some SA's "find" command for deletion.

And the OFA spec definitely does NOT put data files beneath ORACLE_BASE or ORACLE_HOME (http://www.hotsos.com/e-library/abstract.php?id=19).

So I agree with you on both accounts.

For what it's worth.

Cary Millsap

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Fri Aug 04 2006 - 12:59:11 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US